为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。 G5 g) X# e8 E2 M
6 N% s& H0 D' G0 F# `* j
/ V. Y3 V4 B6 ]& |+ y" n. ]! UGroups of Agents with a Leader
% f3 `* u1 b# X1 Q h! j Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。! q) Z) _$ h2 c; c* x
+ K2 E( J- L h: {9 t1 w/ V
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
% \* v5 H+ P: l4 ^( Q
+ E% G; _; w# z, e
4 Z# ]' a, u; V6 ~ J- w3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 3 C0 F$ U4 m# X. D6 W9 Q
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |