为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
+ n) n# s' _" n/ C3 Y7 w1 R2 v. y* \, K, B: q u. `0 U
# m D; ~% j8 C4 lGroups of Agents with a Leader 9 P- P# P0 M8 W* L
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。* A& v% w& y* S8 l5 V# P" Y0 x' n) S
" O/ P4 K0 W: Z+ d* ]* D$ A
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!" V& N, }% h& H% {6 `, {4 }! |# y T4 o
7 {5 ]' G) ~% O6 i! t7 g
' ]) m3 g6 |) F" F( t3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 0 B( } N; L3 p: z3 Y% k
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |