为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
( J1 @- j% w T( u4 ^& X$ A. I8 @9 I7 c6 F' R6 [* D
5 T+ V9 s4 V( T4 c8 A# z
Groups of Agents with a Leader
, H$ ]4 U% X* A! d) M Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
6 q$ I9 M" `, \8 s1 O
u" f1 I8 X" z0 {只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
9 E& @. e" T% U& I" N- m, X6 ^* g/ h8 t6 j t" c6 e
( J+ k3 s$ h+ a) `9 L; C3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 7 @ i! } B7 K
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |