为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
# f) X, D. S3 ]8 s( s) N- D
; k# v5 X- b; d: G$ Z* q0 O- C! e9 Z; i; I7 Q) J$ `* V
Groups of Agents with a Leader - b7 X3 O; p i J) ?: @) R
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。, j& H2 \/ I# I! a% H" s
% l2 b! m- Z r; I3 J) E, J$ H; E$ i
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
3 P: K0 m8 Q+ k% J' n( Q/ z1 w2 X. L( V; P& H& g
3 G. K+ n" X' s. X
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | + [. d4 Z/ K& |: }8 n. y$ z! U1 N
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |