为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。/ k9 |* Q: _- E6 ^! w0 K
8 T8 `& A6 S( D7 c
. i) s, r$ w/ D1 E: ~Groups of Agents with a Leader : S6 E4 q8 m2 R
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。, w) {( q5 p4 O8 e$ w7 F+ s" U
3 \+ d# J! F5 ^! l* U( C7 F只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
e/ Y8 x4 i, p: P
6 x7 `! e' R6 C- i. E# I2 _. k0 d+ B0 [ W% J4 P8 m4 C* b* f$ b4 F
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | : C5 j, k' O3 R5 K# E7 @9 Y7 b! e
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |