为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
' G4 N7 v5 d, q: U& t$ Z) ~7 ]# |6 ^% {5 K. E$ O& o
9 [" `# H+ S& w5 C& C2 M# dGroups of Agents with a Leader
* s6 _! `* r, L6 l" Z" P5 L3 K$ { Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
8 ~7 B" s2 Y- m. E
$ n2 z1 B5 `/ n; V; u- [只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
( E) X) N- P6 \1 S: E% ^0 k4 X% {1 z$ j7 O4 [
6 V$ g5 g5 L. _+ e
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 7 \; E" B7 ^' y' W1 m
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |