为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。3 E* U1 _$ l3 p- j: y, ^* H
: e8 I5 @6 h `7 K- ~
. ~( `6 ^8 C7 R1 [3 k% I
Groups of Agents with a Leader
) t. V9 [) s5 g7 d% b$ v+ ]' h Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
9 I4 z7 P- D8 k h; [' e. `1 u7 i( L) a/ I9 R
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!( e) {2 L4 L7 Y, @7 h
3 ^$ V! o0 V4 B1 Q. V; Q i6 K, P0 Y! Y9 ~) z5 L( |
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
" s- {& M; C( `6 ?3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |