为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。 b# s: g" ~6 K/ a) J, [5 p
4 [; l `7 B0 ` C+ w, g' C) M* V& x! O) P3 [- [' O
Groups of Agents with a Leader % M5 L7 Y7 x1 Z3 E
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
% ?+ ~, d) c9 S/ c) G
& N. A4 q5 J0 Q/ ?只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!: F% {1 s G. [% l
) @8 p6 _+ C! B8 a) O& k0 {: y* T
4 f" l( `7 J! y4 }* ~* }# D3 w7 ]3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | * }( Y( Z6 i+ d# z
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |