为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
: {1 {! V1 X. r5 Z- S- _
; e4 Z8 o' u$ ~2 K
5 i' C6 h9 k9 O' U' ~" ~Groups of Agents with a Leader
+ m7 ], Q& l# W- \0 e! c" \, {/ D Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。6 ~( k5 y7 b) {0 ]& T/ O
. F$ U6 Y- v* K" S$ S- l3 s/ X
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
' j1 s3 Q9 g( h- T7 \+ b' w, B" L6 R8 q. y- I- }7 n
( X3 r% @0 i9 t* w4 f8 V& r
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 0 X' D" u5 T4 p! N9 U. S
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |