为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
) |, G, W0 h7 D8 j$ D- n
/ V& z; A# F9 ~% A3 x% d, _) k- w
# v4 w$ a( i3 Q' {. w7 mGroups of Agents with a Leader
# Z/ E% v5 O5 @1 y7 q6 @ Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
" |8 `' Z! m; w$ J8 K) u" x. U& Q/ m# m+ L6 M* i; n+ a) F4 ~. i
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!8 f) _# p9 Q" j J" q# h
8 L* p6 }, |8 _0 u6 I' b
% J T9 L+ l: S/ [- |+ G
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
# ~2 |! g+ Y) S7 I3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |