|
Deborah A. Sadowski ,Mark R. Grabau* M7 E K' S3 ], ]" A
There's a common misconception that performing a simulation study involves a sequence of steps (e.g., project definition, model formulation, verification, validation, analysis). To the contrary, all elements of a simulation project should be performed repeatedly throughout the effort,
3 ~3 P1 P b$ V4 m: R, m8 Jgrowing in scope as the model progresses. 4 @+ p# i% C! {8 l z- h
In the traditional view, projects suffer from too strong a focus on the model (and perhaps the animation), so that after the inevitable delays and problems, there's no time left to run scenarios. Instead, the analyst is faced with a presentation deadline that's firm and little time to experi-3 O G" z; S R- R2 c7 U
ment, analyze, or think.
2 \( k1 j$ Z' X$ B8 o4 YInstead, you should schedule the project in complete phases. Intermediate milestones, spaced no more than about two weeks apart in a medium to large project, should include specific goals for the model, animation, data, and analysis. By the time you reach the last 25% of your time on the project, you should have addressed the basic analysis issues of run length, warm-up time, etc. and should already have performed preliminary analysis on the model for a number of different scenarios. |
|