设为首页收藏本站

最大的系统仿真与系统优化公益交流社区

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 3276|回复: 0

[交流] 仿真误区2:Leaving analysis for the end

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-7-16 16:27:37 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Deborah A. Sadowski ,Mark R. Grabau* M7 E  K' S3 ], ]" A
There's a common misconception that performing a simulation study involves a sequence of steps (e.g., project definition, model formulation, verification, validation, analysis). To the contrary, all elements of a simulation project should be performed repeatedly throughout the effort,
3 ~3 P1 P  b$ V4 m: R, m8 Jgrowing in scope as the model progresses.  4 @+ p# i% C! {8 l  z- h
In the traditional view, projects suffer from too strong a focus on the model (and perhaps the animation), so that after the inevitable delays and problems, there's no time left to run scenarios. Instead, the analyst is faced with a presentation deadline that's firm and little time to experi-3 O  G" z; S  R- R2 c7 U
ment, analyze, or think.
2 \( k1 j$ Z' X$ B8 o4 YInstead, you should schedule the project in complete phases. Intermediate milestones, spaced no more than about two weeks apart in a medium to large project, should include specific goals for the model, animation, data, and analysis. By the time you reach the last 25% of your time on the project, you should have addressed the basic analysis issues of run length, warm-up time, etc. and should already have performed preliminary analysis on the model for a number of different scenarios.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|手机版|SimulWay 道于仿真   

GMT+8, 2025-7-6 16:32 , Processed in 0.013747 second(s), 15 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表