为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
# y5 S& E) S& v* T8 P, ~4 O. F) e$ l1 R- b r! B6 z
7 b- w2 D! R9 U! _( V& IGroups of Agents with a Leader $ n* I Y: U0 F9 P" z# v1 Y3 A+ X
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
9 d. \ B: u" D3 G W5 F- P( u) h) S( f
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!0 C1 V7 H6 G" I" d5 {
3 g; K6 P6 T4 E) n" [& H
' S2 g% A K$ f5 g: l% n3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
! Q, i1 t; Q. T8 P3 t" r3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |