为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
& D M6 ?5 m1 W, H: _( X3 e9 J, B q% ^$ [
, z9 R) E- \; s: Y$ ?% cGroups of Agents with a Leader 7 J8 P2 F* l) x# B
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。) |1 @7 E% M' D5 u. j! u
# n( w3 H' P+ \/ l5 p% c' i只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
' t9 U- V6 v# p8 S; m. X9 ^/ x0 E6 l' S+ W2 Z
- T0 Z9 q2 y2 d% {- K3 T; i3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
5 B3 q3 d u& D' _1 M' f3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |