为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
7 U, n" F0 e! t8 p9 P6 p3 x; y1 ~4 B
! e( ?7 |: k8 D# a& s( l
Groups of Agents with a Leader
) N) v' j8 I, C: I7 _7 i! M Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。1 E: A7 L7 l8 D5 p8 H, n2 X
. x8 k) b% w1 t: i1 h( n
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
) u* V1 X3 S& K; e8 G0 V+ \0 ^, L! p5 O% M
$ B; a/ S# r% P" B
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
" |5 s/ [' l. ?, [3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |