|
Deborah A. Sadowski ,Mark R. Grabau
7 G0 M* f; J* F5 l1 d+ MThere's a common misconception that performing a simulation study involves a sequence of steps (e.g., project definition, model formulation, verification, validation, analysis). To the contrary, all elements of a simulation project should be performed repeatedly throughout the effort,
! i$ U2 s& Y/ Y0 W, ugrowing in scope as the model progresses.
( m4 y, f4 i8 P! _, mIn the traditional view, projects suffer from too strong a focus on the model (and perhaps the animation), so that after the inevitable delays and problems, there's no time left to run scenarios. Instead, the analyst is faced with a presentation deadline that's firm and little time to experi-
* _0 C1 w |0 [! `! `$ {. ?ment, analyze, or think. : Q# a2 M/ p/ L/ W& N2 e4 R
Instead, you should schedule the project in complete phases. Intermediate milestones, spaced no more than about two weeks apart in a medium to large project, should include specific goals for the model, animation, data, and analysis. By the time you reach the last 25% of your time on the project, you should have addressed the basic analysis issues of run length, warm-up time, etc. and should already have performed preliminary analysis on the model for a number of different scenarios. |
|