为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。$ L9 u$ Q, M! g( {2 o' h% {% r6 ?' H
3 ~ ]9 [# g5 o8 S: U, m
. P5 T6 ?4 q' M9 O1 p6 a, R- EGroups of Agents with a Leader
. x+ h3 u4 n" X& t8 R Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。5 Q& o0 |# h" x. ]' |; l9 ^) ^ y
$ z( N9 B& S/ g$ Q只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
* {0 v+ R9 v0 t$ w2 c" ]6 X; v( k5 u5 l* M R
/ D/ d% A! T) m* {3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
( s+ F% w6 E. T. f& v/ c) I8 {3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |