为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。% q+ r$ D; J' Z! u
2 u! g ?" Q8 i1 u0 F. q
) X" P0 ^- _& I' ~& m9 X! a6 uGroups of Agents with a Leader
1 L& x$ U; V, c, W4 r, m" e% [: R9 R Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
4 B, ]& R* E- k5 a( Y! _( j1 d5 P/ ~& Q+ Q
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
5 n& J. l2 C, E" n8 l) T, M% ]5 Y, W4 i
( U- U7 n$ e/ D6 Q# s
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
9 r {8 i1 N" J3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |