为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
" ^4 D; J [- l% ~- Z( h- b- W* K
9 |: g' x5 P2 ?0 t+ a3 c2 P: ?/ v9 O7 |# q" u8 ~3 H
Groups of Agents with a Leader
8 X9 [: \! C) R Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
" Z" `6 |% w; N; a1 n! r: \- M" P1 X$ {3 v: {, l2 V
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!5 L$ A, w1 R* P) U( W( V; |- W1 p" D
% y$ V% {+ G" W5 a6 R8 \/ `5 D
; a6 J: H( L |+ [3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
; @: A$ \' @( Z: l P$ c8 T3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |