为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
/ x6 M; S& k' e* R& @
1 Z1 ]' Q4 X' G( x4 R
7 z. ]1 @! P ?; `& y; K$ q( ? ~Groups of Agents with a Leader & l5 b, ? u3 b4 U2 B- E0 x
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。: }9 `8 Z* [; w, x/ I9 d; }
) }3 W+ [% |3 ^ k6 Z) q/ p只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!4 J1 R5 `$ j9 x' Y. ~" u6 T' m
' A; f) z- R8 I, t- t) n/ Z9 d( ]& v0 Q- p8 ~7 ^- F+ r
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
8 [0 W0 ?" F. L; w! U4 J3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |